In a 2016 report, the North Carolina Commission on the Administration of Law and Justice called for pretrial justice reform  – reform that would move the state away from a de facto system of requiring all criminal defendants to post cash bail in order be released from jail prior to their day in court.
The reform recommendation came in response to concerns that the cash bail system was badly flawed – concerns that experts have echoed and expanded upon in a series of recent Policy Watch reports that detailed individual and systemic corruption within the bail system , the system’s unjust impact on the poor  and the concerns of veteran jurists  that profit and politics have compromised the original intent of state statutes dealing with bail and the presumption of innocence.
The report concluded that the state should replace the existing cash bail system with “an empirically derived pretrial risk assessment tool and develop an evidence-based decision matrix to help judicial officials best match pretrial conditions to empirically assessed pretrial risk.”
Two years later, however, North Carolina is not appreciably closer to that sort of statewide reform.
Yet in some of the state’s largest counties, pretrial services programs of just type recommended are already in place. What’s more, where they operate, they are driving down court and jail costs while decreasing the number of people who fail to appear for court dates or are again arrested while awaiting their court dates.
For the programs’ clients, the vast majority of whom are poor, being released as part of a pretrial service program is more than a convenience. It can mean keeping a job they would otherwise lose while in jail awaiting a court date or caring for their children when no one else can.
Many working within the patchwork system of county pretrial services programs, however, say they are not holding their breath waiting for statewide reform.
“I don’t think you’ll ever have a statewide pretrial service system like you see in some other states,” said Jessica Ireland, program manager for pretrial services in Mecklenburg County . “I don’t think the state would pick up funding pretrial. But I think you can have a risk-based assessment in every jurisdiction.”
What makes Mecklenburg County the gold standard in pretrial services programs in the state is its risk assessment tool. Using information on in-custody defendants as variables, the tool assigns a number score to predict the chances of future criminal activity or whether individuals are likely to appear for their court date. The scores are used in recommendations for either pretrial release without bond or in setting reasonable bond requirements.
Those meeting the pretrial program’s criteria may be released into the program’s custody. They may then, depending on their risk level and circumstances, be required to undergo substance abuse screening, come to weekly office check-ins or have some other sort of supervision.
The program costs the county about $1.6 million annually, Ireland said, but the money it saves in preventing failure-to-appear charges and overcrowded jails has won it broad support from police, judges, prosecutors and public defenders.
“We have a really good collaborative system put together with all our judicial partners,” Ireland said. “We try to use the jail space more wisely so people who can be released with little to no supervision will be. Remember, these people are presumed innocent. A lot of them are only in jail because they don’t have the money to get out.”
The system is working, Ireland said. In tracking from November to February, 93 percent of those using the pretrial system appeared for their court dates. Eighty-five percent of those using the system had no new charges between their initial arrest and their court date.
Ireland adds that the last number would be even higher if one accounts for things like simple traffic offenses, which are not separated out in their data.
Last year Mecklenburg, Buncombe and Durham counties were all part of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation’s Safety and Justice Challenge , a $100 million initiative to support jurisdictions with funding and technical assistance. Its goal is “safely reducing the number of arrested people who are brought to jail and increasing the use of evidence-based tools, such as pretrial assessment instruments, in pretrial decision-making.”
Mecklenburg was awarded a $2 million grant which it’s using to identify and deal with racial and ethnic disparities in its system, provide alerts for trial dates to reduce failure-to-appear rates and safely reduce its jail population by 13 percent.
Durham’s pretrial program was awarded $50,000  which it has used to create an Automated Notification System (ANS) to remind people of criminal court dates.
Gudrun Parmer, director of Durham’s Criminal Justice Resource Center, said it’s remarkable how much of a difference a simple call, text or email reminder can make in reducing the number of people who fail to appear for a court date and then end up in jail.
“We wrote a web-based application where you can go online and sign up to see the charges and the dates for any case,” Parmer said. “It could really be used in any jurisdiction, so hopefully we’ll be able to share it with others.”
Next month, the county will have a report on the results of the reminder program, but the numbers for the pretrial program are already good.
Last year, almost 94 percent of the program’s clients appeared for their court dates. Nearly 93 percent avoided new charges before their court dates. Almost 92 percent of those admitted to the program completed it without breaking any of the conditions to which they had agreed, which can range from keeping a curfew and regular office check-ins to attending school if they are students.
The caseload of clients can be between 80 and 100 at any given time – a lot to manage for a relatively small department of only five full-time employees.
Ultimately, Parmer said, she would like to see the program expand to 24 hour operation, with a risk assessment model like Mecklenburg and a closer relationship with the courts and magistrates.
“I would like for us to begin working with people before they have to spend the night in jail or longer,” Parmer said. “Everyone is presumed innocent. They shouldn’t have to be there if we can help.”
In the coming weeks and months, Policy Watch will continue its series of stories exploring the bail industry in North Carolina – its influence, impact and costs to the state and its people. We’ll talk with bail bonds agents, attorneys and law enforcement officials as well as those who have dealt with the industry at some of the most vulnerable moments in their lives.
If you would like to share your experiences with the bail bond industry with Policy Watch as these stories unfold, please contact investigative reporter Joe Killian at email@example.com .