By Ariana Figueroa
WASHINGTON — Georgia’s new voting law was at the center of Tuesday’s U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, where senators discussed restoration of a key section in the Voting Rights Act that would prevent states, mostly in the South, from changing their election laws without federal approval.
During the more than four-hour hearing, witnesses opposed to the sweeping new Georgia law warned that if Congress did not modernize and pass Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act, then voters of color would be disenfranchised. The law limits absentee voting, restricts drop boxes to inside early voting locations except during a public health emergency, and makes it illegal to hand out food and water to those waiting in long lines to cast their ballots.
“Record numbers of Georgians used their voices and voted in the last election,” Sen. Raphael Warnock, a Georgia Democrat who testified as a witness, said at the hearing. “And in response to this swell in Democratic participation, politicians in our state legislature responded not in celebration but with retaliation.”
Warnock was joined by other Georgians at the hearing, including Stacey Abrams, the founder of Fair Fight Action, an organization that works to reduce vote suppression, and Republican state Rep. Jan Jones, the speaker pro tempore of the Georgia House who sat on the Special Committee on Election Integrity that crafted the state’s controversial 98–page voting bill.
“We should be deeply concerned by the aggressive and naked attempt to wrest control away for purely partisan purposes,” Abrams said.
Georgia became the subject of national controversy for its flurry of proposed voting restrictions that followed baseless complaints of election irregularities peddled by former President Donald Trump and many supporters after losing the November election to President Joe Biden by 12,000 votes.
Georgia’s 2020 election cycle was the most secure in the state’s history, according to GOP Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Biden’s victory was confirmed by machine and hand recounts three times.
Abrams said that if Georgia’s current law had been in place during the 2020 election, then the presidential election could have had a different outcome.
The Peach State not only went historically blue for Biden and saw record turnout from Black voters, but also gave Democrats a thin 50-50 majority in the U.S. Senate by electing two Democrats, Warnock and Sen. Jon Ossoff. Vice President Kamala Harris casts tie-breaking votes.
Sherrilyn Ifill, the president and director-counsel for the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc., added that even if civil rights organizations could file lawsuits to get new voting laws overturned, elections would still be affected, as litigation can take years.
“In the years during the pendency of a case, thousands, and in some cases, millions of voters are disenfranchised,” she said. She added that since a pivotal 2013 Supreme Court decision, her organization has seen a wave of laws enacted with the intent to suppress Black and other voters of color.
In 2013, the Supreme Court by a 5-4 vote struck down the heart of the Voting Rights Act— Sections 4. That section created a formula to determine if racial discrimination had been more prevalent in certain states. Another section required such states to receive clearance from either the Justice Department or federal government before enacting changes to voting such as polling places, procedure and redrawing congressional districts —but without the formula in Section 4 it was unworkable.
The Supreme Court directed Congress to create a new formula and pass it into law, which has yet to be done.
The act applied to nine states; Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia. In North Carolina, 40 counties were subject to Section 5 preclearance.
Ossoff, who was mentored by voting and civil rights icon the late Rep. John Lewis, (D-Ga.), asked Abrams how the new Georgia law affects runoff elections. Ossoff won his runoff against former Republican Sen. David Perdue with 50.3% of the vote compared to Perdue’s 49.7%.
She said that in runoff elections, Georgia voters have had three weeks of early voting. Under the new law, that’s cut to one week.
“To claim that it is an expansion of access to a majority of Georgians is not only untrue, it is misleading and it is false,” she said.
Jones, the Georgia state legislator, argued that the bill was crafted to make it easier to vote and ensure election integrity. She defended the provision that prevents snacks from being passed out within 25 feet of a polling station, saying that in the past, campaign workers have handed out water or food displaying their candidate’s message.
The bill does allow poll workers to set up self-serve water stations for voters to use, but it’s not a requirement.
“It’s a practice referred to as ‘line-warming,’ and while not technically illegal it surely violates the spirit of free elections,” she said. “The fact is that most states have a prohibition of activities considered to be campaigning or electioneering within a protected space.”
Hearing title criticized
Most Senate Republicans at the Judiciary hearing took issue with its title: “Jim Crow 2021: The Latest Assault on the Right to Vote.”
Ranking member Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican, argued that it was offensive to Republicans, since they support voting rights.
“Like others on this committee I am a fan of history,” Grassley said in his opening statement. “I try to learn from it. I don’t use it to insult my opponents.”
Grassley, along with Sen. Josh Hawley, a Missouri Republican, said the decision by Major League Baseball to move the All Star Game from Atlanta was an overreaction caused by Democrats’ response to the state’s new voter law. They faulted Biden for referring to the new voting bill as “Jim Crow.”
Grassley also referred to MLB’s action as “economic terrorism.”
Sen. John Kennedy, a Louisiana Republican, questioned Abrams on how she could know the Georgia law was racist.
She said that some provisions of the bill were grounded in racial animus, especially when it came to mail-in ballots, as the state had heavily used vote by mail and early voting for 15 years.
“It was only after voters of color for the first time in 15 years successfully used those provisions in favor of the party they disproportionately supported that those rules changed,” she said.
“Voters of color in Georgia were more likely than white voters to vote by mail for the first time in the last two election cycles,” Abrams said. “Suddenly SB 202 shows up and shorts the time period to request a return in absentee ballot (application) and imposes new restrictive ID requirements that will have an amplified effect on disabled voters, older voters, voters of color and Black Georgians in particular.”
Across the country, a massive introduction of voter ID requirements and restrictive voting laws is being led by the GOP at the state level.
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a statement that voting rights would be a priority for his party, and criticized not only the new Georgia voting law, but the hundreds of restrictive voting laws sponsored by Republicans making their ways through state legislatures.
“And these laws are moving through state legislatures all across the country, including the most recent one in Georgia, which, among other so-called crucial reforms, makes it a crime—a crime—to provide food and water to voters waiting in line at the polls, even though in minority areas the lines are often much longer because there are fewer polling places,” he said.
Restaurant chains slammed over resistance to minimum wage hike for tipped workers
By Laura Olson
WASHINGTON — As the nation’s largest trade group for restaurant owners on Tuesday held a virtual version of its annual gathering to lobby Congress, advocates for a $15-per-hour minimum wage took aim at the powerful restaurant chains that they say are blocking legislation on a higher wage for tipped workers.
During their own virtual event, lawmakers such as Wisconsin Democratic Rep. Mark Pocan and advocates for raising the minimum wage sought to contrast the National Restaurant Association’s opposition to legislation that would raise the federal minimum wage with comments from the chief financial officer of Denny’s, one of the association’s members, that gradual increases in the minimum wage haven’t been a problem.
The diner chain’s CFO, Robert Verostek, said on an earnings call first reported by The Daily Poster that the company’s California restaurants “outperformed the system” during the time frame when California was increasing its required wage, which will reach $15 by 2023.
But in a letter to congressional leaders in February, the National Restaurant Association wrote:
“We share your view that a national discussion on wage issues for working Americans is needed — but the Raise the Wage Act is the wrong bill at the wrong time for our nation’s restaurants.”
“The CFO spoke the truth to the analysts, but meanwhile was funding the National Restaurant Association’s fight against one fair wage,” said Rosanna Weaver, a program manager who tracks CEO pay for As You Sow, a nonprofit shareholder advocacy group.
The advocacy event, which featured restaurant workers and owners speaking about their experiences with the minimum wage, comes as Democrats in Congress are grappling with how to get a bill approving a $15-per-hour wage to the president’s desk.
President Joe Biden has said he supports such a hike, which over time would double the current $7.25 federal minimum wage. That rate was last increased in 2009.
The minimum wage is even lower for tipped workers, whose base wage before gratuities can be as little as $2.13 per hour. The minimum-wage bill pending in the House would gradually phase out that lower rate for tipped workers.
Seven states already require the full minimum wage, with tips in addition to that base pay: California, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, Minnesota, Montana and Alaska, said Saru Jayaraman, president of the advocacy group One Fair Wage.
Congress did not include a proposal for raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour in the last coronavirus aid package. The Senate parliamentarian had ruled that including it in that bill would violate the rules being used to pass the bill without any Republican votes.
The minimum wage hike was still proposed in the Senate as an amendment to the stimulus bill, and eight Senate Democrats voted against it, including Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, (D-Ariz.).
“We are going to get it through the Senate, no matter how many thumbs up, thumbs down, curtsies, you name it. We’re gonna get it done,” Pocan told advocates Tuesday, referring to the thumbs-down gesture given by Sinema when she voted against the minimum-wage hike amendment.
Pocan was one of several members of Congress to speak at Tuesday’s event, along with Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent, and Reps. Andy Levin and Brenda Lawrence, both Michigan Democrats.
Lawrence described the lower minimum wage allowed for tipped workers as “an insult,” arguing that passing the minimum wage hike “will be a strong step in ensuring that every worker is treated with dignity and respect.”
Federal background checks on ammunition sales pushed by Democrats
By Ariana Figueroa
WASHINGTON—Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida and Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut on Tuesday reintroduced legislation that would require instant background checks to prevent individuals with a criminal record from illegally purchasing ammunition.
The measure backed by the Democrats, known as Jaime’s Law, is named in honor of Jaime Guttenberg, a student who died in the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School mass shooting in Parkland, Fla., on Feb. 14, 2018.
She was 14. Fourteen students and three staff members were killed.
Jaime’s father, Fred Guttenberg, has worked as an advocate against gun violence since her death.
“I should be watching Jaime live out her best senior year, right now, getting ready to graduate, attend prom and go to college,” Guttenberg said during a virtual press conference. “But instead we’re watching as others are living off these milestones and we’re wondering why haven’t we done anything about gun violence yet.”
Other lawmakers in attendance included Reps. Lucy McBath, (D-Ga.), whose son, Jordan, was killed in a shooting, and Ted Deutch, (D-Fla.).
“Jaime’s law is for families like mine, for families like the Guttenbergs, and for families across the country who are terrified that one day they’re going to send their children off to school and never see them come home,” McBath said.
Democrats have called the repeated recurrence of mass shootings a public health crisis and have pushed for bans on assault rifles and “common sense gun laws.” President Joe Biden issued several executive orders to try and curb gun violence.
There have been 156 mass shootings this year, according to Gun Violence Archive, a nonpartisan organization that tracks gun violence in the U.S.
The reintroduction of the bill also coincides with the 22-year anniversary of the Columbine High School shooting of April 20, 1999, in Colorado that left 15 dead.
If passed, the law would close a loophole that allows ammunition to be sold with no background checks.
While those with a criminal record, or who have mental illness are prohibited from buying a firearm or ammunition, there is no federal law that requires a background check on the purchase of ammunition.
Wasserman Schultz said she recognized that the bill has an uphill battle in getting passed into law, particularly with current Senate rules that require 60 votes to advance legislation.
“We as lawmakers can make it more politically painful inside the halls of Congress. Returning to a talking filibuster would be a start,” she said, referring to increasingly rare marathon speeches intended to hold up action in the Senate.