Daily News

Sex-ed funds N.C. should abstain from

Wednesday, November 28th, 2007

By Chris Fitzsimon

Janet Colm
CHAPEL HILL - In the past decade alone, the federal government has wasted more than $1 billion on wishful thinking.

What’s the wish? That if we tell today’s teenagers to wait to have sex until they are married, we will be able to protect them from pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases.

Just two weeks ago, Gov. Tim Kaine of Virginia became the 14th governor to reject federal abstinence-only funding. Gov. Mike Easley should join him. North Carolina received more than $1.6 million in federal funds for abstinence-until-marriage programs in fiscal year 2006. Meanwhile, every year more than 14,000 North Carolina teens contract a sexually transmitted disease and more than 18,000 become pregnant.

These programs are a waste of money. Abstinence-only is inadequate to prepare teens for the complexities of sex in the 21st century.

As the mother of a 15-year-old son, I understand the wish to protect our children from the dangers of sex. But these programs don’t help. Study after study has found that abstinence-until-marriage programs are ineffective. They do not increase abstinence. They do not delay age of first sex. They do not reduce the number of sex partners teens have. They do not reduce pregnancy or sexually transmitted diseases.

That’s what the nonpartisan group National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy says in a study (”Emerging Answers 2007″) that evaluated 115 sex education programs. Researcher Douglas Kirby found that there is no strong evidence “that any abstinence program delays the initiation of sex, hastens the return to abstinence, or reduces the number of partners.” Furthermore, there is “strong evidence” that some programs “actually had no impact on teen sexual behavior.” more…

Email This Post Email This Post Print This Post Print This Post